--- In [email protected], George Cristian Bina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Willem, > > The ns attribute is inherited from the nearest ancestor, that means from > the grammar element in your second example, see rule 9: > http://www.relaxng.org/spec-20011203.html#IDAEBZR > The refs are expanded later, see rule 19 > http://www.relaxng.org/spec-20011203.html#define-ref > > The rules are applied in order, see: > http://www.relaxng.org/spec-20011203.html#simplification > that means rule 9 is applied before 19. > > Best Regards, > George > -- > George Cristian Bina > <oXygen/> XML Editor, Schema Editor and XSLT Editor/Debugger > http://www.oxygenxml.com > > willem.vanheerde wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@> wrote: > >> 2008/6/30 willem.vanheerde <willem.van.heerde@>: > >>> Hi there, > >>> > >>> I have a question about the default namespace > >>> attribute ns. > >>> Is this inherited when using define? > >> Yes, see the namespaces in xml recommendation. > >> http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/#defaulting > >> > >> The scope of a default namespace declaration extends from the > >> beginning of the start-tag in which it appears to the end of the > >> corresponding end-tag, excluding the scope of any inner default > >> namespace declarations. > >> > >> regards > >> > >> -- > >> Dave Pawson > >> XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. > >> http://www.dpawson.co.uk > >> > > > > Oke, that is for the default namespace declarations with xmlns. > > > > But how about the relax-ng ns attribute. > > In my second example I expected that the ns attribute declaration on > > the <start> element would also be active for the > > definitions in the <define> element; so the element "test" > > would also have no namespace. > > > > I would expect that replacing all the <ref> elements > > with the content of the corresponding <define> elements > > should make no difference. > > But this a wrong assumption? > > > > Hope you can clarify this. > > > > Regards, > > > > Willem. > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >
Hi George, Thanx for the answer! I understand now. Best Regards, Willem.
