James Clark scripsit: > What does XMLSpy complain about?
For many years, at least, XML Spy rejected some valid schemas and
accepted some invalid ones, but it was so pervasively used that it
became a de facto alternative standard for the validity of XML Schemas.
I don't know if this is still true.
--
We call nothing profound [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that is not wittily expressed. John Cowan
--Northrop Frye (improved)
