Ah, thanks! Hope all is well, Stephane. On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 6:22 PM Stephane Thiell <sthi...@stanford.edu> wrote:
> Hi John, > > I think this is because changelogs (that are by FID) require the parent > FID to be present in the DB. I recommend to drop the DB, scan once, enable > changelogs, then scan again. Then you should be good to go without frequent > scanning. > > Best, > -- > Stéphane Thiell > > > On May 31, 2024, at 4:11 PM, John White <jwh...@lbl.gov> wrote: > > > > I have a new 3.1.7 install on rocky8 running ddn 2.12.9 on the client > side and 2.12.9_ddn8 on the server side. Changelog readers enabled on our > 4 MDTs.I started the daemon to confirm the changelog was functioning before > starting the initial scan. rbh-find was full of unresolved fid paths and > then the filename: > > 0x5c00292d9:0x12e97:0x0/5_1_1_/rho_5_2_imag.dat > > 0x5c00292d9:0x12e97:0x0/5_1_1_/rho_5_3_real.dat > > 0x5c00292d9:0x12e97:0x0/5_1_1_/rho_5_3_imag.dat > > 0x5c00292d9:0x12e97:0x0/5_1_1_/rho_5_4_real.dat > > 0x5c00292d9:0x12e97:0x0/5_1_1_/rho_5_4_imag.dat > > 0x5c00292d9:0x12e97:0x0/5_1_1_/rho_5_5_real.dat > > 0x5c00292d9:0x12e97:0x0/5_1_1_/rho_5_5_imag.dat > > > > But once I started the initial scan, fully resolved paths came into > being alongside the unresolved paths. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > robinhood-support mailing list > > robinhood-support@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/robinhood-support > >
_______________________________________________ robinhood-support mailing list robinhood-support@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/robinhood-support
