Updates:
Status: Accepted
Labels: Target-2.8.3
Comment #4 on issue 1586 by pekka.klarck: Support java.util.List arguments
for *varargs
http://code.google.com/p/robotframework/issues/detail?id=1586
I fully agree that it makes sense to support *varargs with Lists if
**kwargs use Maps. Lists are also more convenient to use in Java than
arrays in general.
It's strange Jython fails to coerce [1, 2, 3] e.g. to List<Short>, but I
doubt that's really an issue in normal usage. I would assume that
List<Integer> is enough in 99.x% of use cases where even that x is pretty
big.
There's at least one regression in 2.8.2 (issue 1589) that is bad enough to
require 2.8.3 sooner rather than later. I hope we can include this issue
into that release too.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "robotframework-commit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
