On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Jakob Schwendner <[email protected] > wrote:
> Hi Sylvain, > > in principle ok. I am not sure on the wording of the "owners" team. Maybe > management? > "Owners" is a default team in Github with all admin rights on an organization ... Unfortunate name, but I would really not create a second team with the same role. > This pulls up the question on the management of rock as a whole, not just > repo rights (but I guess its somehow mirrored). > Obviously. Now, I would do it "the open source way" and let those who code speak for themselves, at least for now. This is why I personally want to favor pull requests and the MLs for discussion *before* code gets merged, in order to include as many interested parties as possible. > Also, I don't agree with the last section. I would not want to rule who > has committed the most in the dicision on who gets the rights. > I don't understand your last sentence ... Can you explain ? Sylvain
_______________________________________________ Rock-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.dfki.de/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/rock-dev
