> > Does it mean that it will be organized as it is in gitorious? Meaning: > rock.core (now it's rock.base + rock.toolchain + rock.gui + some drivers > like transformer, frame-helper and few more) > rock.slam > rock.drivers > rock.control > rock.planning > rock.tutorials > ... > Yes.
> Question: Would the new rock package set have an impact in the folder > structure? Meaning frame-helper will be located into ./core/frame-helper > instead of the current ./image-processing/frame-helper or perhaps > ./core/image-processing/frame-helper > No. The folder structure stays the same. Since there is already a kind of renaming during the migration (e.g.: > rock.core). Question: Do we what to rename some rock package set (i.e: it > would make more sense to have one called rock.perception which could be the > current rock.image-processing + image stitching + pcl related stuffs, + > future things ...) for me it is +1 > I think this is a separate matter. Would you see the folders being merged as well ? Sylvain
_______________________________________________ Rock-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.dfki.de/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/rock-dev
