> > And here is the point i criticize about the bashing from sylvain, he > didn't have a point > at all, and started bashing me for no reason. I have good reasons for the > things I do, and > I really hate it that I need to defend every step I make. >
For the record: I've made three mails in this whole thread that were questioning your approach. In these three emails, 80% were giving facts (basically, the benchmarking I've done) and the 20% of the rest were saying that I believe that you are optimizing the wrong parts and explaining WHY I believe so. Having re-read these emails (3 times), I really don't see any bashing (but I've been told that I have a high threshold to consider something bashing). The most offensive statement is probably In other words: you are attempting to optimize something without having done any profiling. This is a cardinal sin. Which is true and true: - you would have shown some detailed profiling of pocolog runs if it was otherwise - optimizing without profiling is like debugging by looking at the code: trying to do science without doing any experiment ever. real 0m56.849s > user 0m54.927s > sys 0m1.832s > Are you *even* interested in the fact that I replay twice as many samples in more streams with 1/4th of the time on my machine ? That's what bothers me here (and why I think you're looking at the wrong angle). It would leave 75% left to optimize after your changes. Or maybe my benchmarking is wrong. You want to handwave it away ? Your choice to make ! But simply say so instead of calling me names. You've measured that typelib demarshalling is not the issue ? Great, you proved me wrong there, I can have a look elsewhere (Mea culpa: I did affirm in a previous email that it was the problem without having profiled it yet. Having done some real profiling today, I could have told you that it was indeed not the main issue). Now, it does *not* remove the fact that I replay (with a clean pure-pocolog script) a lot faster that yours do. The question I am asking myself is why. It seems that I should be ashamed that I do. Anyways, this closes the issue for me. F.. do whatever you want. Sylvain
_______________________________________________ Rock-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.dfki.de/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/rock-dev
