> we talked about this, and said that these types are pulled later from > the typelib-registry? no need to resolve them recursively at the level > of the clang-based-tool? (which still needs a proper name...) No name: I would personally integrate it as a typelib plugin in the typelib source tree.
Sylvain _______________________________________________ Rock-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.dfki.de/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/rock-dev
