> Just my two cents: Doing Frameworks means doing things right. Allowing > many persons to profit from the work of smaller subgroup. And this takes > time... Quick-Hacks have no place in a Framework... I very much agree with that. Thanks for taking a step back here.
I have a feeling we need to improve the way we discuss our development of Rock. A few ideas for this: * do a video chat once a month. I would start with anyone who wants to participate. When we reach number over the technology limit we could always limit later to core development team. * Record decisions and discussions. The wiki is probably the best way for now. I kind of liked the loomio tool, though. * Improve ML communication. Really stick to what we agreed on: discuss bigger changes in the ML. If in doubt how big the change is, discuss. * Your opinion REALLY is important. If you have one, join the discussion. Even if it's just an agree/disagree. I know sometimes it's difficult to join into a heated discussion. Not heating them too much could be a way here. Conciseness on the discussion could also help. Let me know what you think, or if you have other ideas on how to improve. Cheers, Jakob _______________________________________________ Rock-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.dfki.de/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/rock-dev
