Bluechip wrote: > If he wants to get stupid about IPR and S/w Patents etc. then let's give > hims a run for his money !?
Somebody mentioned small claims court. If it goes to court, this is a copyright matter, so that means Federal court. If you have an ironclad case in a patent matter, the average cost to *you* to fight it is around $1 million. That's with right on your side. Copyright cases are probably a lot cheaper -- with an ironclad case (is this really ironclad?) we could probably get by for less than $50k. Maybe it's worth $50 to 100k to him. Is it to us? This is why so many developers cave in cases like this. *Winning* is more expensive than rolling over. > > BC > >> Yeah, I agree that doing anything to change ours at the moment is >> pointless. We shouldn't just say "Screw you" or anything, but no >> steps/changes should be made to what we have until at least some more >> discussion has happened between Popcap and us. >> >> On 4/18/06, *Paul van der Heu* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >> On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 21:04:39 -0400, bk wrote: >> >If it's just a matter of changing some colors around or something >> >else minor I don't see the harm if it means avoiding potentially >> >disasterous legal complications. >> >> There's more to it.. IF you 'just change some colors around' you >> basically admit guilt and in all honesty there's nothing to be >> guilty about IMO.. If push comes to shoe you can always back down, >> but I think the case for keeping it as it is is way too strong to >> just let it go.. IMO.. >> >> Paul >> >> >>
