On Thursday, 20. April 2006 20:05, Daniel Stenberg wrote: > Personally I can't see Tag Cache as a cache at all so bundling the dircache > (which I do view as a cache) with Tag Cache like that would feel highly > unintuitive to me. I agree totally! It always confuses me that it's called "cache" - tagdb or metadb would be a much better name for it...
with regards, Matthias Mohr (aka Massa)
