Forwarding Sebastien's reply to the list -- Daniel Stenberg -- http://www.rockbox.org/ -- http://daniel.haxx.se/
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:05:30 +0200 From: Sebastien Delestaing To: Daniel Stenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Rockbox Development <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Gweled graphics being questioned Ah well, first let me tell you I'm glad they saw you first ;) All I can say is that I did those graphics with Inkscape from a screenshot of Bejeweled. I can't see how it would be illegal but IANAL. (+ mine are better ;) It's your decision but I would not bother fighting other 7 icons. And it's easy enough to make them slightly different anyway. You can change the colors to start with. How about the attached example, still illegal ? Seb Le mercredi 19 avril 2006 � 00:28 +0200, Daniel Stenberg a �crit :
Hey I'm one of the guys involved in Rockbox (http://www.rockbox.org/). We have a little plugin called 'Jewels' that is using graphics that originate from your Gweled application: http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/PluginJewels We recently received a rather unpleasent mail regarding the Jewels graphics: http://www.rockbox.org/mail/archive/rockbox-dev-archive-2006-04/0116.shtml (fairly long thread in there) ... which also hit "the news": http://lwn.net/Articles/180172/ This mail is just a heads-up for you, since the graphics these guys question come from your program. We have not yet decided on how to act, we're still discussing it back and forth. PS, the rockbox-dev mailing list will discard mails from non-subscribers so I'll volounteer to forward any replies. Should you want to.
gem01_2.svg
Description: image/svg
