I'd like CVS commit access, but I don't know that I'd be much more
proactive than the current devs -- a patch /should/ a certain amount
of time on the tracker, to ensure it's "beta" tested.
That said, tooting my own horn, I think a couple of my patches are
pretty much no-brainers and if I had commit access I'd likely add them
(after the feature freeze).
Daniel Stenberg wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Liberman Shachar (Lamed) wrote:
I don't know if this is some feeling many contributors share, but I
for once feel that many of my work, which I always make sure is worthy
gets left out of the main cvs branch, and not for a good reason but
for the reason nobody takes the time having a look at it.
This is how it is and yours are not the only good patches that are still
pending due to us committers focusing too little on patches or simply
just not having enough time in our lifes. But it is also a matter of us
focusing on getting a 3.0 out the door so there should be a focus on
fixing the relevant bugs (only).
Personally, I just haven't had much time for Rockbox for months.
For anyone without CVS commit access who think you have what it takes to
get it, please speak up and we'll take everyone into consideration. We
need more committers.
