On 27/07/06, Jonathan Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 27/07/06, [IDC]Dragon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > well, seen as im not really getting any feedback, > > Heh, sorry for not following this in detail. I'd be interested if and how much this saves on code size vs. the extra tables. Anything which helps to get the critical Archos footprint smaller is a great help.
Ok, i was going to say there is a 400byte shrink on the h300, but i just checked against a build from a few days ago and its about an 80byte increase, so it might be the different compiler versions.. anyway if it is a gain its nothing to worry about...
unfortunatly, this we wont know untill its fully implemented. > > Jörg > > -- > > > Echte DSL-Flatrate dauerhaft für 0,- Euro*. Nur noch kurze Zeit! > "Feel free" mit GMX DSL: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl >
I have put up the latest diff on the wiki page http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/ButtonActionIdea which is pretty much ready to go, except it will break every target except the iriver.. So if you like this idea and want to speed it up could you please copy the apps/keymaps/keymap-newtarget.c to apps/keymaps/keymap-<target>.c and make it work? the keymap-h1x0_h3x0.c file should provide more than enough examples on how to do it all. 1 thing to note for that file. all the ACTION_STD_* codes should be assigend, and all ACTION_WPS_ must be assigned. I tihnk it will work if the others are not. and so we dont get 4 people doing the same taregts please reply to this or the wiki saying which target your going to do :) cheers guys!
