On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:36:48 -0600, "Paul Louden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Nobody has suggested that it be erased. > >The only suggestion has been that it follow the same rules as every other >unsupported build, and maybe change to a less confusing name. It was an >exception early on, but several things about the situation have changed: The >fact that it has been updated with more patches, and the fact that we now >have a guideline for unsupported builds. > >It won't disappear, and in fact it goes to a place where more people can >more easily find it. All you have to do is get someplace to store the file, I don't have a place to store the files, which is why I set up the wiki page in March last year, after canvassing opinions on this list. >and create a forum topic in the unsupported builds forums It's been there since before that forum existed and was moved there by an administrator when that forum was created. >(please read the >guidelines before you do) with all, or however much, of the content from the >wiki page and you're done. No more than five minutes work and you're in line >with the new system, and in a place where an Archos user searching for an >alternative build is much more likely to find you. I'm really not going to waste any more time on this. Do what you want with the wiki page. I'm done.
