Honestly, a forced rotation yearly might reduce consistency, rather than improve it. Because there's no guarantee everyone wants to be on the steering board, there may be a relatively small number of developers who are both willing to be on it, and meet the wants of the developers as a whole with a decent degree of confidence. If you force the developers to be unable to vote for their top 5 picks, all you're doing is saying "Every other year you can only have the second-best steering board instead of what you feel is the best."

If a board is bad, it will naturally not be chosen again. If it's good, there's not a real problem with members of it continuing the next year.

Reply via email to