Frank Gevaerts wrote: > Currently it is more or less expected that every commit improves rockbox > (except for accidents), and that no change gets committed that has known > instabilities or introduces new known bugs. > > Maybe we should relax that a bit for the first few weeks after the > release.
I like the idea of a merge-window (to borrow a term from Linux kernel development) just after a release to get waiting features committed. I think we should be able to judge whether bug reports are likely to be fixed and worth testing on a current build, although it certainly does make handling bug reports more complicated. -- Jonas Häggqvist rasher(at)rasher(dot)dk
