> I can imagine though, that it'd be rather time consuming for the people > involved.
I think that depends on the patch, the problems, the people involved, etc, etc. For all we know, there could be a great patch in the tracker that only needs a few tweaks before it's ready to go in. Or conversely, there could be one that is universally deemed "not worthy" and can be closed immediately. I think in most cases, there are certain people who know a lot about the state of the patch - it's just a matter of having that information shared with everyone else in this type of focussed scenerio and seeing where it leads. I'd like to volunteer as note-taker unless someone else is superkeen on it. Also, I agree that the "POTW: FS#1234" mailing list suggestion box is a decent-enough way to make a pile of possibles. Of course the problem then is deciding on which one to review that particular week, but I'm sure a quick "how about this one?" "sure" "sure" "whatever!" will do. Salut, Marc
