On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Paul Louden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> less useful features should be considered critically even if they have > small binsize costs, just because they're useful to only an exceptionally > small group. They're a dilution of the total "usefulness density." > Using your terms, Paul, it would seem there is disagreement in how important "usefulness density" is as a goal. For example, the World Wide Web has an extremely low "usefulness density", but is very useful. Of course, the importance of usefulness density wholly depends on the "cost" of "storage".
