On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Björn Stenberg <bj...@haxx.se> wrote: > The point is that the fading code is ballooning. As we add the feature on > more targets, we have to add more conditions and settings due to different > targets implementing it differently. > > We currently have no less than four configuration defines dealing with > backlight fading:
would those vanish if we removed the possibility to configure the fade in / fade out delay? > The parallell question I like to ask is: If this is so important, why don't > we have a time setting (or two!) for the fade-on-stop feature? I guess simply because nobody did it yet? At least I missed that feature a couple of times (especially as we have configurable times for crossfade). - Dominik
