Thomas Martitz wrote: > Bryan VanDyke wrote: >> Sorry about posting a file and not a patch. I have patch files now if >> anyone wants/needs them. The task has been closed and I don't know how >> to add them after-the-fact. >> >> Just for clarification, the file isn't a reversion but was intended to >> be a patch for 10029 and the code at the time of 10029, but the task was >> closed and code change before I could post my patch. >> >> Bryan >> >> > Ok, I re-opened. Upload your diff. I'm seeing the differences, but you > removed a lot of code again which I added (code of the original > implementation). > > We still agreed on keeping the original implementation, so don't be sad > if it's getting closed right after again. > > Best regards, kugel. >
No problem. Patch uploaded. Thanks. Bryan :)
