Mike Holden wrote:
I don't plan to go over all this again, look in the archives!
You're correct in as much as you say, but you aren't answering the
original statement on this current thread. The original statement on this
current thread was that multiple leading zeroes would be reduced to a
single zero for sorting purposes, which I don't believe was the consensus
(such as it was).
Seriously though, this was done to death a few weeks ago. If anyone want
to pick up where that left off then fine, but I wouldn't advocate going
back to the beginning again! I'm not sure the thread ever reached a
definitive list of requirements, but I do believe it got pretty close.
If you happen to know the exact consensus, then feel free to quote it. I
just stated what I recall. And I'm fairly sure nobody explictely wrote
down the consensus. But most of the people seemed to agree on what I wrote.
What you propose (taking all leading zeros into account) is what he have
in SVN now. If that was the consensus, there wouldn't have been noise
still after I committed it.
PS: Keep saying "No, this was not the consensus, go read what it was" is
not helpful at all.
