Frank Gevaerts wrote:
This sounds good to me, though I'd go one step more firmly and say "exact behaviour will change in future versions." At the very least, we know there's a few problems with it that are going to be resolved.My view on this is that we should leave natsort in, but make the traditional ascii sort the default for 3.3, and add a note to the release notes stating that it may not be in its final form, so exact behaviour could change in future versions.
