Paul Louden wrote:
This is basically the point I bring up any time I bring up binsize - is it worth more than other things we could do with this space? It's harder to take things out if we need to reclaim the binsize, than not put them in in the first place if there's a high likelihood other things could better use that space in the future or if the idea is just a "wouldn't it be neat if" that doesn't really serve a useful purpose. This one is pretty complex, but mostly useless and has drawbacks over the current way we do things anyway.
Can we talk about binsize if we have an actual proof of concept which actually allows us for judging about it? I still fail to see complexity, but I do see the usefulness.
