> Any objections to FS#10399? Its purpose is to suggest "better" names when > saving settings. E.g., when saving equalizer settings, the name "eq00" > (instead of just the general "config00") would be suggested. The user can > then edit the name (nothing changed in this regard).
Sure! One related question - why do we have the double zero? I'd prefer config_1, config_2,... (or eq_1, eq_2,...) personally. pondlife
