On 17/07/2009 15:49, Rafaël Carré wrote:
I think these functions do not belong to this API, and in fact this
commit was not the correct way to go.
Instead they should be renamed (according to my above explanation)
That is precisely what I was about to suggest - these functions only
have meaning for physical disks, so naming them storage_* does not make
sense.
Re: FS#9545, I don't see what else might be needed before commit. It's
confirmed working on at least two multi-driver targets, and there should
be little to no overheads on existing single-driver targets. But then,
I'm rather biased as the D2 SD driver depends on it going in ;-)
Rob.
