2009/9/24 Thomas Martitz <[email protected]>: > How's it done for %St? Checkwps doesn't build the whole settings struct > either. > > Best regards. >
checkwps doesnt check that the setting name is valid (Which is silly really...)
2009/9/24 Thomas Martitz <[email protected]>: > How's it done for %St? Checkwps doesn't build the whole settings struct > either. > > Best regards. >
checkwps doesnt check that the setting name is valid (Which is silly really...)