Jonathan Gordon wrote: >... > Here is my reasoning: > 1) doing that would give users 3 weeks to tests before release > 2) there is one week to go before freeze anyway which means no biggish > features will go in anyway +1 for branching this weekend.
> 3) I' not happy with the current state of the sbs stuff and want to > commit FS#10824 and 10709 (I think thats the numbers) but doing so > will definitely piss people off, and I'm out right not waiting a month > more to check them in. >... > Jonathan > Since the branch should contain only stable features, or ones that are agreed they are to be committed, what's the problem of not committing even if the branch was delayed a bit ? (Really asking) -- MT
