> > >> If the problem is making people go back through the history of the wiki >> page to figure out what has changed and what isn't in the manual. As long as >> there's a tracker entry describing _every_ new tag (and/or new feature) that >> isn't >> in the manual yet, then it's a matter of going through a list and closing >> tasks, rather than trying to figure things out by comparison. >> > > I like Paul's suggestion. I do not think that forcing everyone to learn > TEX is a productive use of time, but I do feel that the manual should be > complete. Posting an entry in the tracker makes it easy to follow and can > be added by people who know the manual and know TEX. As long as the proper > category is set it should be quick and easy to find new manual entries that > need to be included. > > -Karl >
Yes, this is what I was getting at. I don't mind adding tags to the manual if people tell me what they are, but I object to having to try and search through the history of a massive wiki page and work out what is and isn't already there. Alex
