2010/3/18 Yoshihisa Uchida <[email protected]>: > Then these were commited once. (it is efficient.)
I completely disagree here. Commiting a number of patches in the same commit is definitely not _efficient_. It might be _convenient_ for you (assuming that you have all those patches already applied in your working tree). However, it makes it impossible (or at least extremely hard) for others to review the commit. I'm pretty sure that at least some do so (speaking for myself I'm reading such commit diffs if time allows and I'm interested in the part of the code). Besides, the changes were already split up into individual patches, so no additional work for that. As a side note, please do not top-post to this list. Our mailing list etiquette asks you to not do so, and as we're asking our users to follow that committers definitely should follow that. - Dominik
