On 14.09.2010 22:55, Paul Louden wrote:
On 9/14/2010 3:47 PM, Rafaël Carré wrote:
This commit log isn't really much less descriptive than, say, "fix
red", which
seems to be an acceptable commit log though.
So while I prefer long and descriptive log messages, this particular
log doesn't
really bother me.
So was this a "fix red" commit then? Was it related to a screwup in a
previous commit, or entirely unrelated.
"Fix red" pretty explicitly tells someone that this is a followup
commit to a slightly earlier one that caused build errors. "Grumble"
on the other hand leaves me no clue if it was related to something
else you did earlier, or not.
I agree, fix red (even if not terribly good either) is a lot better than
this.
Best regards.
