On 15 September 2010 16:33, Jonathan Gordon <[email protected]> wrote: > On 15 September 2010 16:26, Paul Louden <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 9/15/2010 1:23 AM, Jonathan Gordon wrote: >>> >>> Then your complain should be why we dont have a better way of >>> communicating interesting changes to users which has come up plenty of >>> times and noone cares enough to set it up. Using the commit log for >>> this is just plain bloody wrong. >>> >>> A blog has been "green lighted" but the dev group and just needs >>> someone to set it up, so why not use some of your energy into making >>> things better instead of just complaining? >> >> I notice you didn't explain how clear commits is "bad" still. Even if we had >> a blog, there's no good reason for commit messages to be unclear or not make >> any attempt to tell what happened. >> >> So instead of trying to turn this into another discussion, why not just >> explain why commit messages aren't needed? >> > > ok, do this... http://www.ohloh.net/p/rockbox/contributors/17085379909957 > is a link to my ohloh rockbox stats.... find a single commit which > shows is a non trivial fix commit that suggests I think commit > messages arent needed... then we you dont, go back to working on > integrating a blog into the frontpage. >
Its alot easier when someone has 37 commits to find a bad one.... http://www.ohloh.net/p/rockbox/commits/22027901 "Fix a bug concerning difficulty, pointed out by DerPapst in IRC.". No context at all, not even the name of the plugin.
