On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, Dave Chapman wrote:
What I think Bagder is proposing (and what I'm fully in favour of) is to formalise this process a little - most people already discuss commits in IRC before committing, so this is just saying how many people need to agree with it before it can be committed, and what happens if there are objections.
Exactly. By formulising how we make decisions, we can discuss less about the actual decision-masking and discuss the actual subjects more.
I also think that by adopting a way that has been in use successfully by large, active projects we can possibly avoid some sharp corners.
-- / daniel.haxx.se
