Probably a very sensible idea.
On 10/11/2010 10:32 PM, "Teruaki Kawashima" <kame...@r6.dion.ne.jp> wrote:
> (2010/11/10 1:16), Alex Parker wrote:
>> On 9 November 2010 16:57, Teruaki Kawashima<kame...@r6.dion.ne.jp> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thank you for suggestion and information.
>>> I agree that it would be better to look for magic number.
>>> but I'll leave it for now unless it causes serious problem that judging
by
>>> file-extension.
>>>
>>> teru
>>>
>>
>> Whether going on file extensions generally works or not, is there a
reason
>> not to use the magic numbers seeing as everyone seems to have agreed that
>> that would be better?
>>
>> Alex
>>
>
> The patch is already large enough to me and I don't feel like to add
> another feature which might introduce another issue.
> It can be changed to use magic number later if it is desired.
>
> teru
