Alex Parker <parker.ale...@gmail.com> writes: > On 4 Jan 2011 23:52, "sideral" <asieoni...@gmx.net> wrote: >> > This way only the tracks with resume info would end up in my >> > database, saving me the couple of MB of RAM that the entire >> > database (with my lots of files!) would otherwise take needlessly >> > (as I don't use the database). >> >> This may be a misunderstanding. The autoresume feature does not >> depend on the DB being held in RAM (tagcache_ram option). > > No, but as I understand it auto update does, so if you want resume to > work on newly added files you will need either to rebuild the database > each time or have auto update turned on. I could of course be > misremembering this.
I believe you're correct. I do not know whether Slasheri's statement encompasses the possibility to extend the online DB with new tracks without enabling tagcache_autoupdate and tagcache_ram, but I'd hope so. Anyway, I'd very much like to help improving the database in this area once we're finished with this discussion. sideral
