On 17 March 2011 19:10, Thomas Martitz
<thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de> wrote:
> The database already merges multiple volumes. It's just not hotplug-aware
> and there's no query for the paths/filenames. But anyway, I think this would
> be rather simple to implement (the latter, at least) and not worth a GSoC
> project.
>
Have you investigated this? I have a feeling it is on the edge of what
would be acceptable size wise. Either way, if this were part of a
bigger project it would be good.

> I think a real unified file view via the file browser (or even both) is what
> we want. For writing capabilities and to not impose the database to people.
>

"We" want both.

Reply via email to