On 17 March 2011 19:10, Thomas Martitz <thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de> wrote: > The database already merges multiple volumes. It's just not hotplug-aware > and there's no query for the paths/filenames. But anyway, I think this would > be rather simple to implement (the latter, at least) and not worth a GSoC > project. > Have you investigated this? I have a feeling it is on the edge of what would be acceptable size wise. Either way, if this were part of a bigger project it would be good.
> I think a real unified file view via the file browser (or even both) is what > we want. For writing capabilities and to not impose the database to people. > "We" want both.