On 30 March 2011 20:34, Frank Gevaerts <fr...@gevaerts.be> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 08:18:15PM +1100, Jonathan Gordon wrote: >> Hi, >> How much do we really care about the graphical plugins working on >> RaaA? Really I'm asking about pictureflow and credits. > > I would assume that the people who want pictureflow on a DAP will also > work on RaaA. I personally don't use it, so I won't argue that it's > critical :) > > I think credits is a bit different though. I think it's fairly reasonable > to interpret GPLv2 2c as saying you're not allowed to drop the credits > plugin, but even without that I think we really want to have that list > accessible. Of course temporarily breaking things during development > shouldn't be a problem, but the credits functionality will have to be > restored in some way fairly soon I'd say. > > What happens if plugins are built assuming a small screen? Will they > break horribly, or just show up awkwardly in a corner? > > Frank >
They wont compile currently, and yeah, I thought about the gpl issue but then is it even possible to break our own license?
