On 8 July 2011 10:45, Paul Louden <paulthen...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Jonathan Gordon <jdgo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> The whole point is to remove the incnsistancy in the draw oordering >> with no option to change that (once this temp hack falls out of use). >> > > Explicit ordering options wouldn't be inconsistent. > > But again, why include a temporary hack that you know you're going to > remove? How is removing it later better than removing it now? If > people need warning, give them warning and then change over, but > having an interim period of both doesn't change the fact that many > people won't update their skins until they have to. >
Because I dont know how long ill be able to suppoort the hack, and doing it more permenantly means we are stuck with it which I dont want. There is no real reason t frce the change now though