On 8 July 2011 10:45, Paul Louden <paulthen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Jonathan Gordon <jdgo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The whole point is to remove the incnsistancy in the draw oordering
>> with no option to change that (once this temp hack falls out of use).
>>
>
> Explicit ordering options wouldn't be inconsistent.
>
> But again, why include a temporary hack that you know you're going to
> remove? How is removing it later better than removing it now? If
> people need warning, give them warning and then change over, but
> having an interim period of both doesn't change the fact that many
> people won't update their skins until they have to.
>

Because I dont know how long ill be able  to suppoort the hack, and
doing it more permenantly means we are stuck with it which I dont
want. There is no real reason t frce the change now though

Reply via email to