On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 01:05:38AM +0200, sideral wrote: > I'd like to commit FS#10849
I don't use the sleep timer myself (in fact, I think I never even tried it), so I'm not sure how much my opinion is worth here. I think that the patch adds real functionality that's hard to achieve by other (existing) means, and I don't really believe that the new options can be considered a regression for any use case. Moreover, my impression is that the new functionality is wanted by a fair amount of users. I haven't looked at the actual implementation, but it's a fairly small patch that doesn't touch the sort of code that's rumoured to harbour dragons, so I think we can trust the judgement of whoever commits it as far as quality is concerned. Frank -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan
