>> The projects I saw were indeed a bit non-brilliat, with near zero noticeable >> improvements > >I don't see now "noticability" is any factor at all to consider as to wether a >project idea is good or bad for gsoc. > >> 1. There is no reason to not have plugins for all the popular machines >> before 1997. > >If there really is no reason, then how come we don't already have them all? > >-- > > / daniel.haxx.se
You are obviously correct and I'm sorry to have suggested something impractical
although not on the technological basis which is what I was speaking to. You
see things up close so you obviously know the factual reasons for not improving
rockbox while in my ignorance from a distance I see things from a theoretical
basis only and cannot possibly know why not to improve something. Keep up the
good work guys. Anything but ipod and I'll take what I can get!!!
Thanks again for reading about my suggestions for improving rockbox even if
they don't pan out for some reasons I'm ignorant of such as google paperwork or
whatever it is,
Very Respectfully,
Jason
--
Jason Taylor
Blog @ http://twitter.com/jasontaylor7 updated once a day.
HOME PHONE #: +1-301-277-6032
