On 10/06/2012 03:22 PM, Dominik Riebeling wrote:
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Richard Quirk <richard.qu...@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for reviewing that. Unfortunately I missed a set_sleep_timer in 327,
but did not spot the compiler output as I had 327 and 328 staged on the same
branch. Clean up here http://gerrit.rockbox.org/329 :-(
Too late, since this broke pretty much all builds I fixed in the meantime.
Yeah saw that too late. Thanks, and sorry.
However, there are some things I don't like about the original patch:
1. previously it's been set_sleep_timer, now it's
set_sleeptimer_duration. Note that it changed from sleep_timer to
sleeptimer.
This is mainly so the 2nd part follows the common convention. The other
menu settings that change setting xxx have set_xxx in the callback name.
The setting is called sleeptimer_duration.
2. set_sleeptimer_duration doesn't indicate in any way what's
different to set_sleep_timer (which is still present). IMO it would be
better to have functions indicating the unit used, i.e. change both
and use set_sleep_timer_seconds and set_sleep_timer_minutes (or maybe
abbreviated as _sec and _min).
True. Though there's still only 1 visible function externally.
I didn't comment on that earlier since I'm usually not involved in
that part of the code ...
- Dominik
