On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 07:06:04PM +0200, Sascha Lüdecke via rockbox-dev wrote: > Great to see progress! Is there an easy way to support the migration > with testing on a iRiver DX90 > (https://www.rockbox.org/wiki/IBassoDXPort[1] ) ?
The DX50 and DX90 are actually unaffected by these proposed toolchain changes, as they rely on the tooling provided by the Android NDK. Coincidentally, several months ago I revamped the DX50/DX90 builds to use a much newer (but still the oldest available) version of the Android NDK, moving from gcc 4.6 to gcc 4.9 and turned on much higher levels of CPU-specific optimizations. So, if you could try using a recent-ish nightly build on your DX90, we can confirm the tooling changes did not introduce any regressions. There are also several DX90-related bugs in the tracker [1] that need to be confirmed as still present or closed. Thanks, - Solomon [1] https://www.rockbox.org/tracker/index.php?string=dx90 -- Solomon Peachy pizza at shaftnet dot org (email&xmpp) @pizza:shaftnet dot org (matrix) High Springs, FL speachy (freenode)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
