|
Looks like someone's
not paying attention to what thread they are responding to :) Then
again, maybe it was my fault for responding to one and starting a new thread at
virtually the same time. :)
By the way, not that
we need another change of subject, but does anyone know why my messages took so
long to be distributed to the list. I sent both messages yesterday just
before 2PM local time (CDT) and they didn't arrive in my mailbox until just
before 10AM this morning (which actually was 20 minutes AFTER Cary's
reply).
Scott
-----Original Message----- Cary,From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Paul Moore Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 6:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Rodopi] No 'On Hold Late' on weekends By doing it on a radius profile it in effect removes Rodopi from the picture. What happens is that when the user dials in during a blackout time the user will be rejected, similarly as a simultanius login attempt (which is handled by radius not Rodopi). It doesn't actually suspend the account and thus no accounting issues a dependency on Rodopi to do billing correctly and on time. I haven't had a chance to actually test it and am not sure if it is the proper syntax (but looks good to me). In my case the user wants the account dissabled while they are at work so the kids can't get online and do what kids do. Not sure if they want it on weekend or not. hehe the power at my fingure tips. Guess I had better make a call. Paul Cary Fitch wrote:
|
- [Rodopi] Blackout certain hours Paul Moore
- [Rodopi] Blackout certain hours Marius Strom
- [Rodopi] Blackout certain hours Paul Moore
- [Rodopi] No 'On Hold Late' on weekends Scott Collins
- [Rodopi] No 'On Hold Late' on weekends Cary Fitch
- [Rodopi] No 'On Hold Late' on weekends Paul Moore
- [Rodopi] No 'On Hold Late' on weekends Scott Collins
- [Rodopi] No 'On Hold Late' on weekends Cary Fitch
- [Rodopi] Blackout certain hours Scott Collins
