Salut,
Am o problema. Si anume, cum trebuie sa definesc mount point-ul pt.
CD-Writer in /etc/fstab ca sa pot sa vad continutul acestuia dupa
comanda mount /cdrom.
Patch-ul ATAPICAM a mers f. bine, iar mesajul primit la bootare este:
....
Sep 18 12:01:10 Barney /kernel: ata1-slave: ATAPI identify retries exceeded
Sep 18 12:01:10 Barney /kernel: ad0: 19607MB <QUANTUM FIREBALLP AS20.5>
[39838/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100
Sep 18 12:01:10 Barney /kernel: acd0: CD-RW <CW038D ATAPI CD-R/RW> at
ata1-master PIO4
Sep 18 12:01:10 Barney /kernel: Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s2a
Sep 18 12:01:10 Barney /kernel: cd0 at ata1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
Sep 18 12:01:10 Barney /kernel: cd0: <CyberDrv CW038D CD-R/RW 100C>
Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device
Sep 18 12:01:10 Barney /kernel: cd0: 16.000MB/s transfers
Sep 18 12:01:10 Barney /kernel: cd0: Attempt to query device size
failed: NOT READY, Medium not present
....
Nu a mers cu mount /dev/cd0c
Multumesc!
Best wishes,
Bogdan M.
INFLPR
Bucuresti
-- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis --
-- File: ATAPI SCSI emulation-patch
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: (from root@localhost)
by alpha1.infim.ro (8.11.6/8.9.3) id g8IAA6631254
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 13:10:06 +0300
Received: from alpha1.infim.ro (bmihal.iftar.infim.ro [193.231.44.72])
by alpha1.infim.ro (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g8IAA5431247
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 13:10:05 +0300
X-Antivirus: This mail was scanned for viruses by AMaViS/F-prot 3.12 on host:
alpha1.infim.ro
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 13:09:48 +0300
From: Root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0rc3) Gecko/20020811
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ATAPI SCSI emulation-patch
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11
>
>
>
>Alex Popa wrote:
>
>
>
>>On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 02:08:05PM +0300, Adrian Penisoara wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>>ATAPICAM : http://www.cuivre.fr.eu.org/~thomas/atapicam/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> Alexandru Popa a dat solutia. Sa vedem ce spune el.
>>>
>>>Ady (@rofug.ro)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>In regula, mingea e la mine... sa vad daca mai stiu cum l-am facut
>>atunci.
>>
>>Am pus patch-urile in home dir la root.
>>Am facut ultimul cvsup pe 28 sau 29 august. Patch-urile se aplica bine:
>> # cd /usr/src
>> # patch -p0 < ~/atapicam-20020820.diff
>> (mult output, totul succeeded)
>> # patch -p0 < ~/atapicam-STABLE-config-20020820.diff
>> (si asta merge)
>>Daca ar fi aparut ceva mai sus in care sa scrie "reject" sau "failed",
>>trebuia incercat inca un cvsup. Am adaugat linia cu "device atapicam"
>>in configuratia kernelului, fiindca aveam deja ata, atapicd, scbus, cd
>>si pass (ce cauta astea aici? am uitat sa fac putina curatenie in config
>>la kernel... nu am SCSI in sistem).
>>
>>Dupa asta, am dat config WATAPICAMBBIT (kernelul meu se numeste WABBIT
>>in mod normal... cand mai pun cate un patch devine WALTQBBIT, sau
>>WATAPICAMBBIT).
>>
>>
>>
>>Dupa ce a pornit, deobicei apare in dmesg un cd "scsi", care este de
>>fapt cel emulat de atapicam. XCDRoast ar trebui sa il recunoasca
>>singur, mai apoi. In general, /dev/acd0c este disponibil ca /dev/cd0c,
>>si asa mai departe. Se pot folosi si device-urile vechi, dar nu in
>>acelasi timp cu cele emulate.
>>
>>E bine de stiut: in capitolul 9.3, se descriu doua metode de a compila
>>un kernel. Prima este OK daca nu s-a facut cvsup de la instalarea de pe
>>cd (sau de la ultimul installworld). A doua este recomandata daca se
>>face un kernel care nu este de aceeasi "generatie" cu world-ul curent.
>>De exemplu, daca apare o optiune noua, sau e nevoie de un Makefile nou,
>>prima metoda poate sa nu reuseasca (am patit-o eu).
>>
>>Cu speranta ca am fost cat de cat coerent intr-un mail scris in 50
>>minute, in timp ce mai cautam atapicam pe web, si mai si stateam pe irc,
>>si mai era si ora 0:20 (1:10 acum), va salut.
>>
>>Alex
>>
>>PS: Caveat emptor: nu am bootat cu kernelul pe care l-am compilat
>>[mmmm... 4min47sec pentru make buildkernel...slow]. Tin minte ca
>>atunci cand foloseam, a functionat OK. YMMV)
>>PPS: In afara de cazul in care mai e un Alex pe aici, ajunge Alex Popa,
>>sau doar Alex. Am "doar" 21 de ani.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>Bogdan
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>__________________________________________________________
>Send 'unsubscribe rofug' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to unsubscribe
>
>
>
>
__________________________________________________________
Send 'unsubscribe rofug' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to unsubscribe
