Question #195843 on rohc changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/rohc/+question/195843
Didier Barvaux posted a new comment: Rolf, > If i understand this right, then the best would be to use SIGCOMP and ROHC > together to get a low bandwith SIP communication, SIGCOMP for the signalling > (XML) part and ROHC for the IP, UDP, RTP and TCP header part? You're right. > I not really understand the relationship between RHOC and SIGCOMP yet and > their possible combined usage. Here > http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/~sri/students/#priyesh, > i saw the effect and an implementation of SIGCOMP and i think this could be > done with > a reasonable amount of work, but i would really like get an understanding of > the possibilities > to get the maximum out of these concepts. SIGCOMP compresses the payload of the SIP packets. ROHC compresses the IPv4, IPv6, UDP, UDP-Lite, RTP, TCP headers. There are 2 different ways to reduce bandwidth usage. There are not incompatible: you can use SIGCOMP to compress the payloads of the IP/UDP/SIP packets and ROHC for the headers of the IP/UDP/SIP and IP/UDP/RTP packets. The ROHC compression of the IP/UDP/SIP packets will not be very interesting because headers are small in comparison to payloads (unless SIGCOMP is very efficient on the payload). Regards, Didier -- You received this question notification because you are a member of ROHC Team, which is an answer contact for rohc. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~rohc Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~rohc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
