Am Friday, 23. February 2007 um 15:52:14 Uhr (+0100) schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Is "All" dyne:bolic "software" [...] free and" is "there is no market > operation behind" even not the statedriven market of arts and so > called "access to modern technology and" this "let people be Free to > Create."? Because "The distinction between what is public and what is > private is becoming more and more blurred."? Dazu der dyne:bolic-Entwickler jaromil, mit der Bitte, es hier zu posten: | as far as i understand their question is left open, so i see nothing bad | in it. in case there are specific doubts to be discussed you are welcome | to include me in the thread. | | if i'm up to reply i'd only mention the fact that dyne:bolic is one of | the few approved as 100% free distributions by the FSF itself, as you | can see on the pages www.gnu.org | | anyway, i think it is healthy to have concerns about real freedom of | things. | | ciao | | - -- | (_ jaromil _)(_ http://korova.dyne.org _) -- http://cramer.plaintext.cc:70 gopher://cramer.plaintext.cc
-- rohrpost - deutschsprachige Liste zur Kultur digitaler Medien und Netze Archiv: http://www.nettime.org/rohrpost http://post.openoffice.de/pipermail/rohrpost/ Ent/Subskribieren: http://post.openoffice.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rohrpost/
