Anil Gangolli wrote:
Actually, you want those two queries to be in one transaction, not
two; otherwise they can see inconsistent state if there is another
transaction committed between the two.
Red herring on my part. Not really a new issue for us though since we
are typically using default READ_COMMITTED isolation anyway.
--a.
- Re: Roller persistence transactions, do we need begin(), c... Allen Gilliland
- Re: Roller persistence transactions, do we need begin... Anil Gangolli
- Re: Roller persistence transactions, do we need b... Allen Gilliland
- Re: Roller persistence transactions, do we ne... David M Johnson
- Re: Roller persistence transactions, do w... Allen Gilliland
- Re: Roller persistence transactions,... David M Johnson
- Re: Roller persistence transactions,... Allen Gilliland
- Re: Roller persistence transactions,... David M Johnson
- Re: Roller persistence transactions,... Sean Gilligan
- Re: Roller persistence transactions,... Anil Gangolli
- Re: Roller persistence transactions,... Anil Gangolli
- Re: Roller persistence transactions,... Allen Gilliland
- Re: Roller persistence transactions,... Allen Gilliland
- Re: Roller persistence transactions,... Anil Gangolli
- Re: Roller persistence transactions,... Allen Gilliland
- Re: Roller persistence transactions,... David M Johnson
- Re: Roller persistence transactions,... Allen Gilliland
- Re: Roller persistence transactions,... David M Johnson
- Re: Roller persistence transactions,... Allen Gilliland
- Re: Roller persistence transactions,... David M Johnson
- Re: Roller persistence transactions,... Allen Gilliland