Can we name release branches using .x instead of .0? (Eg: roller_1.x)
Having a branch named roller_1.0 is a bit confusing to me as I would
assume it contains just that (minor) release.
Max
On Aug 9, 2005, at 4:44 PM, Allen Gilliland wrote:
I've put up some notes on how I think the release system could work
so that it's somewhere more static than just buried in all this email.
http://www.rollerweblogger.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=RollerReleasePlan
Personally, I think this plan should work well for Roller and at
the very least I think it's worth trying out.
-- Allen
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 12:36, Lance Lavandowska wrote:
I echo Matt's comments. While I personally feel monthly might be too
aggressive, you two are going to be feeling the heat (in the
kitchen),
so in the end it's your decision to make.
Lance
On 8/9/05, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dave and Allen,
You guys are obviously biased in your votes here - primarily because
Roller is your job and you've been mandated to schedule the releases
to more fit their work schedule. I don't blame you.
You guys are contributing the most code, and handling all release
aspects - so I believe the decision is up to you. I'm in favor of
whatever you guys advocate. If you are going to go through with
this,
it'd be nice to see a release schedule so we know when it's best to
commit code. I'd like to integrate Acegi this week or next, but if
there's a release coming out soon, I should probably wait.
Matt
