+1
On 9/13/05, Anil Gangolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 > > Note, however, that I checked in a few changes over the weekend. I think > they're stable, but the trunk is not quite what's been running on BSC. > > --a. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dave Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <roller-dev@incubator.apache.org> > Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 10:45 AM > Subject: VOTE: "Roller 1.3 (Incubating)" release > > > > The code in the Roller trunk, aka Roller 1.3, is stable and has been > > running in production at at least one high-traffic site for some time > > now. I propose that we release this code now as: > > > > "Roller 1.3 (Incubating)" > > > > The release will be made up of three files. > > > > roller-1.3-incubating.tar.gz - the complete Roller webapp > > roller-1.3-incubating-src.tar.gz - Roller source code > > roller-1.3-incubating-tools.tar.gz - the jars required to build from > > source > > > > According to the incubator docs: > > <http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/ > > Incubation_Policy.html#Releases%0D> > > We need the endorsement of a mentor and the approval of the Incubator > > PMC. > > So mentors, please advise. > > > > - Dave > > > > > > > > On Sep 10, 2005, at 2:59 PM, Allen Gilliland wrote: > > > >> 1.3 is what i am calling the next release of Roller which is what's in > >> the current trunk. 1.3 includes lots of stuff including bug fixes, the > >> new theme management code which allows for shared themes, and the pojo > >> wrappers stuff. > >> > >> i actually wanted to cut a 1.3 release about 6 weeks ago, but with ASF > >> issues going on we couldn't do it. i definitely think we should do a > >> 1.3 release ASAP and make that the final release from the 1.x branch. > >> once we do that then according to our release plan we would move the > >> current trunk to a 1.x branch and move the 2.0 branch to become the new > >> trunk. > >> > >> personally, i don't care much for all these legal issues. sourceforge, > >> java.net, asf ... they are all good places for opensource projects. if > >> we honestly can't find a way to reconcile the ASF legal issues then i > >> suggest we cut our releases from elsewhere until this stuff is resolved. > >> i believe someone gave an example of a previous incubating project that > >> continued to release code from java.net for a while? can we do that? > >> > >> -- Allen > >> > >> > >> Anil Gangolli wrote: > >> > >>> I'm confused again. > >>> > >>> Was there a Roller 1.3 release, or is this a just a Sun BSC deployment? > >>> > >>> If the latter, can we be a bit more careful with release numbering for > >>> the Sun-internal releases? > >>> > >>> We rely on release numbers in bug tracking and in communications with > >>> users, and we need to be able to understand where we are in a cycle to > >>> assess what to commit and where, and what we can tell users about when > >>> something was fixed or in which release to expect a fix. > >>> > >>> Also, are we planning any more 1.x releases before 2.0 (assuming all > >>> ASF-related topics are covered)? > >>> > >>> --a. > >> > >
