2.0 really would be a great time -- especially that it requires
'comment' table to be renamed. Let me know what to do...
Max
On Sep 13, 2005, at 10:42 PM, Allen Gilliland wrote:
yes! we want it!
with 2.0 coming up this would be a great time to hammer out Oracle
support. this would also align nicely with some of the db changes
that Elias has been working on to get Derby and DB2 supported.
i'm not sure what the best submission method is though ... Dave?
-- Allen
Rudman Max wrote:
We have Roller 1.x running against Oracle 10g database. Migration
was pretty painless as I recall except these major issues:
1) Manual query in the RefererManager had to be reworked (or more
precisely an 'if' for Oracle created)
2) Some constraint names were too long
3) 'comment' table name conflicted with an Oracle keyword.
Let me know if the project has interest in Oracle support and
what the process is for submitting these kinds of patches.
Max
